Security · The break side
The other half of building. The same instinct, pointed the other direction.
Building and breaking are one discipline, not two. To build something that holds, you have to know how it falls — where the trust is misplaced, where the protection was assumed but never proven. We bring that adversarial eye to the systems we build, and sometimes to systems someone else built and believed were safe.
When we build, we already know what an attacker would look for. That's the edge — not a standing security shop, but the instinct that makes what we ship harder to get into.
What we found
user records found exposed
We ran a pen test on a gym chain that believed its members' data was safe. We found more than 50,000 user records already exposed. We told them exactly what was open and how to close it — before anyone else could, and without the catastrophe theater.
How we work it
We go looking for the truth a system is hiding — the access nobody meant to leave open, the assumption nobody tested.
Exactly what's open, exactly how to close it. The number and the fact do the talking — no drama, no upsell.
The same instinct goes into everything we make, so what we build already accounts for how someone would try to break it.
Bring us the problem. We'll tell you what we find, straight.
Start a conversation